Return2PLAi
82

WR · #82 · Arizona Cardinals · week 9 vs Seattle Seahawks · Sun Nov 8 · 4:25 PM ET

Reggie Virgil

  • TYPE Deep threat
  • ROLE in the rotation
  • CLASS 2026 · R5 P143
  • EXP 0 seasons
  • AGE under 25
  • DEPTH WR1
91%PLAY EXPECTED

As of week 9, Reggie Virgil was a WR for ARI, age 22.3, a rookie, drafted in round 5. In 2026 through week 8 he was listed at depth rank 2 on his club's depth chart; he had played 4 games on 18% of snaps; his line was 14.5 receiving yards a game, 3.5 targets a game and a 8% target share. No injury episode was on file.

The full read

In short

How our call moved in week 9

  • our call, P(plays)

91% EXPECTED → 91% EXPECTED

Every call we wrote for him in week 9, earliest first, as written.

In short

Reggie Virgil is in the rotation at wide receiver for ARI — 47% of the snaps in his best week of 5. He has a back injury. His team named him inactive in weeks 1 and 2 and 3 and 4. His team has not listed him on the final report. We say he plays — 91%, in a band that plays 94% of the time. We have said PLAY since 86 hours before kickoff.

13versions in week 9
12average, every player
54most for one player

How the call moved

EXPECTED since Thu Nov 5 · 2:40 AM ET · 86 h before kickoff. Biggest move: 91% → 91%, Thu Nov 5 · 4:06 PM ET to Fri Nov 6 · 6:06 AM ET, with no club report in between.

Our call

Injury report

Our call · week 9

NOT EXPECTEDUNLIKELYCOIN FLIPLIKELYEXPECTED

91% · EXPECTED

we expect him to play — this band plays 94% of the time (92–96%), measured out of fold. We stand behind this one.

No dated practice report for him in week 9

The team has not published one we can date, or the window has not reached it. Not the same as his having practiced.

Head start

  • Our call
  • Kickoff

The evidence behind his current call

We have not read the news for this player this week.

Stats, with ranges — dot = his average, bar = his game range

  • Rec yds / game18 range 0.0–29

    wk 5–9 · 3 games

  • Targets / game3.7 range 2.0–5.0

    wk 5–9 · 3 games

  • Target share9.5% range 5–14

    wk 5–9 · 3 games

  • Snap share21.4% range 4–47

    wk 5–9 · 5 games

Snaps by week — his larger of the offence and defence share

  1. 18%wk 5
  2. 4%wk 6
  3. 4%wk 7
  4. 47%wk 8
  5. 34%wk 9

Missed while on the injury report

SeasonWeeks on the reportMissed while listed
202610

Only the weeks he was on the injury report with a recorded result — not every game of his career.

Medical history

WhenInjuryWeeks on a reportWorst status
2026 · wk 9back1—

Every injury episode on file for him, as the record holds it.

Injury history by season · 1 episode · 1 week on a report

  • listed, and played

Each bar is one episode: the week it began and how many weeks he was on a report, coloured by the worst status.

The rest of his team's report in week 9

PlayerPosPracticeWhose wordCallChance he playsBand
Isaac SeumaloGFULLoursPLAY99%EXPECTED
Kendrick BourneWRUNKteam's word—
James ConnerRBUNKteam's word—
Budda BakerSFULLoursPLAY99%EXPECTED
Josh SweatLBFULLoursPLAY99%EXPECTED
Hjalte FroholdtCFULLoursPLAY99%EXPECTED
Bam KnightRBDNPteam's wordOut
Michael WilsonWRLTDoursPLAY99%EXPECTED
Jon Gaines IIGDNPteam's wordOut
Starling Thomas VCBUNKteam's wordOut
Eku LeotaLBUNKteam's wordOut
Max MeltonCBLTDteam's wordQuestionable
Isaiah AdamsGLTDteam's wordQuestionable
Walter NolenDTLTDteam's wordQuestionable
Jeremiyah LoveRBUNKteam's wordIR
Jayden WilliamsTDNPteam's wordOut
Albert ReeseOTUNKteam's wordOut

The model reads the room: who else is out shifts what his own designation is worth.

The evidence behind his earlier calls

The evidence behind the call made Thu Nov 5 · 2:40 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Thu Nov 5 · 6:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Thu Nov 5 · 11:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Thu Nov 5 · 4:06 PM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Fri Nov 6 · 6:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Fri Nov 6 · 11:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Fri Nov 6 · 4:06 PM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sat Nov 7 · 6:02 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sat Nov 7 · 11:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sat Nov 7 · 4:06 PM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sun Nov 8 · 6:06 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sun Nov 8 · 11:02 AM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

The evidence behind the call made Sun Nov 8 · 4:02 PM ET

We have not read the news for this player this week.

Role

Call history

The data behind this page — the timeline in words, every call and week on record, about him, and what this page does not show

Profile — as of week 9

RoleWR2 · 18% snaps
Season2026 · 4 games through wk 8
Per game14.5 receiving yards · 3.5 targets · 8% target share
Injuriesnone on file
Bioage 22.3 · rookie · drafted round 5

Where the profile comes from

Built from: honors.db; nflverse injuries_2026.csv; medical.db; nflverse players.csv; profile.db; nflverse roster_2026.csv; nflverse roster_weekly_2026.csv; nflverse snap_counts_2026.csv; nflverse stats_player_week_2026.csv. Every number in it is one those sources hold.

nflverse injuries_2026.csv

About him

About himAs the record holds it
His rolein the rotation at wide receiver — 47% of the snaps in his best week of 5
Listed on the depth chartfirst at wide receiver
Snaps played21% a week on average over 5 weeks, 47% at his highest
Build6 ft 2 in · 187 lb
CollegeTexas Tech; Miami (Ohio)
Drafted2026, round 5 pick 143, by ARI
Ageunder 25 at the season's start
Experience0 seasons

When this call was made, and when the world knew

  1. WrittenWe first said PLAY.
  2. PublicOur call became public when the week settled.
  3. KickoffKickoff.

How our call moved, earliest first

WhenLeadCallChance he playsBandOn what
Thu Nov 5 · 2:40 AM ET86 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Thu Nov 5 · 6:06 AM ET82 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Thu Nov 5 · 11:06 AM ET77 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Thu Nov 5 · 4:06 PM ET72 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Fri Nov 6 · 6:06 AM ET58 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Fri Nov 6 · 11:06 AM ET53 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Fri Nov 6 · 4:06 PM ET48 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sat Nov 7 · 6:02 AM ET34 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sat Nov 7 · 11:06 AM ET29 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sat Nov 7 · 4:06 PM ET24 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sun Nov 8 · 6:06 AM ET10 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sun Nov 8 · 11:02 AM ET5 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything
Sun Nov 8 · 4:02 PM ET0 hPLAY91%EXPECTEDbefore his team said anything

13 calls in week 9, and the call never flipped between PLAY and SIT. Each lead time is the one that call actually had when it was written — never recounted from now. A call that changes is the record working: new evidence arrived and we said so, in public, before the game.

Named inactive in week 1

The team's own list. We held it after kickoff, so it could NOT have informed a call. Matched to him by his player id.

Named inactive in week 2

The team's own list. We held it after kickoff, so it could NOT have informed a call. Matched to him by his player id.

Named inactive in week 3

The team's own list. We held it after kickoff, so it could NOT have informed a call. Matched to him by his player id.

Named inactive in week 4

The team's own list. We held it before kickoff, so it could have informed a call. Matched to him by his player id.

What this page does not show

the reader's opinion — it has not read him in week 9.